Remy Bertola vs Kirill Kivattsev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Bertola's second serve win rate stands at 45.74%, whereas Kivattsev has a slight edge at 48.24%. How critical is this metric for predicting match outcomes? It's quite crucial!
• When considering return games, Kivattsev leads again, capturing 45.96% of second serve return points compared to Bertola's 42.9%. On their first serve returns, Bertola slightly edges out with 25.04% over Kivattsev's 23.98%.
• Handling pressure, Kivattsev saves breakpoints at a rate of 55.11%, marginally better than Bertola's 52.15%, which can swing the match in Kivattsev's favor.
• Over the last year, Bertola has a win rate of 54.05%, slightly overshadowed by Kivattsev's 59.09% win rate, indicating stronger overall performance.
• On playing surfaces, Bertola excels with a 64% win rate on hard courts, while Kivattsev's peak is on grass with a 75% win rate. However, Kivattsev’s least success comes on hard courts.
• Bertola primarily competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a win rate of 38.64%, while Kivattsev dominates Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, holding a 63.16% win rate.
• In direct confrontations, Bertola has the upper hand, having won their sole meeting which took place on indoor hard courts.
• Regarding opponent quality, Bertola faces higher-ranked opponents on average than Kivattsev, at 351.15 versus 455.5, hinting at tougher competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Bertola appears more clutch, winning 57% compared to Kivattsev’s 50% success rate.
• Considering break point conversion rates, Bertola is slightly better, converting 36.89% of chances compared to Kivattsev's 32.46%, which might tip the balance in his favor during critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):

Recent statistics suggest that Bertola and Kivattsev are closely matched, yet nuances in their performance metrics indicate subtle distinctions.

While Kivattsev shows slight advantages in second serve performance and dealing with in-game pressure, Bertola's superior experience against higher-ranked players and his dominance on hard courts, the venue of the previous encounter, cannot be overlooked.

Bertola's edge in converting on breakpoints, coupled with his past victory over Kivattsev, suggests a psychological advantage. These factors, when analyzed collectively, make Bertola a slightly more compelling choice for victory in this match.

Ultimately, Bertola's aptness for critical situations and competitive hardness give him a slight but significant edge.

Based on the accumulated data and match context, Bertola is the predicted winner for their upcoming tennis match.